Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3835 14
Original file (NR3835 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
‘DEPARTMENT OF.THE NAVY. |.

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JSR
Pocket No, NRBBBE-14

‘21 August 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

    

Td: Secretary of the Navy
' id ie ‘a be ~ ater a
Subj + * ; * a i . =
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 143 dtd 8 Jan 14 w/attachment
(2) HOMC MIO memo dtd 28 Jul 14 w/fenclosure
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navat
record be corrected by removing the service record page il
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry Gated 6 November 2012
(copy at Tab A).

>. he Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22
August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ali
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office with cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the
Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following
corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 6 November 2012. This is to be accomplished by
physically removing the page 11 on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or.material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present’ at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Sapetin J eA

uy
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S&S. RUSKIN

Recorder Acting Recorder

5, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6({e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4667 14

    Original file (NR4667 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NJP of 15 November 2012. b. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13

    Original file (NR8518-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8068 13

    Original file (NR8068 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 SS. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No. NR8068-13 19 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14

    Original file (NR4610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0955 14

    Original file (NR0955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0778 14

    Original file (NR0778 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navai record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (a) (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entry dated 23 April 2006, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Spain and Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13

    Original file (NR3524 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0847 14

    Original file (NR0847 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the undated service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry concerning counseling for dereliction in the performance of duties, specifically, failing to return his pistol to the armory, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12

    Original file (06982 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...